2020/11/07

[논리학사] F. Johnson (2004), “Aristotle’s modal syllogisms” 요약 정리 (미완성)

     

[ Fred Johnson (2004), “Aristotle’s modal syllogisms”, in D. Gabbay and J. Woods (eds.)(2004), Handbook of the History of Logic Volume 1: Greek, Indian and Arabic Logic (Elsevier), pp. 247-307. ]

  

  

  1. Łukasiewicz’s Assertoric System, ŁA

    1.1 Rejection in ŁA

  2 Łukasiewicz’s Modal System, ŁM

  3 Modern Modal Predicate Logic

  4 McCall’s L-X-M System

    4.1 Rejections in L-X-M

  5 Semantics for L-X-M

    5.1 Thomason models

    5.2 Variants of the L-X-M system

  6 The Chain Condition, Relevance Logic and the AP system

  7 Contingent Syllogisms

    7.1 Overlooked acceptances in the Q-L-X-M system

  8 QLXM’

    8.1 Semantics for QLXM’

    8.2 Q-valid moods needed for completeness

  9 The Aristotelicity of QLXM’

  10 Tally of the Two-Premised Q-Valid Syllogisms

  11 Extensions


  

  

  1. Łukasiewicz’s Assertoric System, ŁA

    1.1 Rejection in ŁA

  2 Łukasiewicz’s Modal System, ŁM

  3 Modern Modal Predicate Logic

  4 McCall’s L-X-M System

    4.1 Rejections in L-X-M

  5 Semantics for L-X-M

    5.1 Thomason models

    5.2 Variants of the L-X-M system

  6 The Chain Condition, Relevance Logic and the AP system

  7 Contingent Syllogisms

    7.1 Overlooked acceptances in the Q-L-X-M system

  8 QLXM’

    8.1 Semantics for QLXM’

    8.2 Q-valid moods needed for completeness

  9 The Aristotelicity of QLXM’

  10 Tally of the Two-Premised Q-Valid Syllogisms

  11 Extensions




(2021.04.02.)

    

댓글 없음:

댓글 쓰기

연구 분야나 관심 분야를 표기하는 방법

핵심어를 단순히 나열하는 방식으로 자신의 연구 분야나 관심 분야를 소개하는 것은 그다지 효과적인 방법이라고 보기 어렵다. 여기에는 두 가지 이유가 있다. ​ 하나는, 사람 만날 때마다 전공 분야가 바뀌는 준-사기꾼들이나, 그 정도까지는 아니어도 자신을...