- 수업명: <과학사 통론 1>
- 2018년 1학기
- 서울대 과학사 및 과학철학 협동과정 대학원 수업
- 담당 교수: 조수남
1. 강의 개요
이 수업에서는 과학기술사의 흥미로운 주제들을 중심으로 고대부터 과학혁명기까지의 과학기술의 역사를 살펴봅니다. 이때 근대 초까지도 과학 분야의 경계가 모호했음에도 불구하고, 수업 전반부에서는 수학, 천문학, 자연철학, 자연사와 같은 세부 과학 분야들로 나누어 해당 분야에 관한 1차 문헌과 최근의 연구들을 통사적으로 살펴보겠습니다. 후반부에서는 ‘번역과 인쇄’, ‘과학과 예술’, ‘과학과 종교’ 같은 논제들을 중심으로, 마찬가지로 관련 연구들을 살펴볼 것입니다. 수업을 통해 과학기술사의 여러 분야와 주제들을 접하면서 본인의 구체적인 관심사를 발견할 수 있기를 기대합니다.
2. 참고 자료
구체적인 독서 및 참고 자료는 강의 첫 시간에 자세히 설명하겠습니다.
3. 평가
독서과제 요약문(30%), 수업 발제 및 토론(30%), 기말 리포트(40%)
매주 주어진 독서과제들을 읽고 요약문을 제출합니다(30%). 수업은 개별 독서과제에 대한 발제와 토론으로 진행됩니다(30%). 기말 과제는 강의를 통해 본인이 관심을 가지게 된 주제에 대해 공부한 후 10장 이상의 리포트를 작성하는 것으로 평가하겠습니다(40%). 평가에 대한 보다 자세한 사항들은 강의 첫 시간에 설명하도록 하겠습니다.
4. 강의 계획 소개
1주. 강의 소개
2주. 우주의 음악과 하모니
3주. 천문학과 우주론
4주. 자연철학
5주. 기하학과 산술
6주. 자연사 연구와 수집
7주. 지리학과 지도학
8주. 의학과 질병
9주. 번역과 인쇄
10주. 과학과 예술
11주. 과학 실험
12주. 과학 기구와 기계
13주. 과학과 종교
1주. 강의 소개 - 강의 주차 소개 및 과제 설명
2주. 우주의 음악과 하모니
■ 독서 및 발제 자료
▪ Peter Pesic (2014), Music and the Making of Modern Science (Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press), pp. 1-131.
▪ 플라톤 저, 박종현⋅김영균 공동 역주, 『플라톤의 티마이오스』 (서광사, 2000) 27c-69a(pp. 74-194)
■ 참고 자료
□ 음악과 과학의 역사 일반에 관한 한글 교재
▪ 구자현, 『음악과 과학의 만남』 (경성대학교출판부, 2013)
▪ 구자현, 『음악과 과학의 길』 (한국문화사, 2014)
□ 천구의 음악과 우주의 하모니
▪ Danilo Capecchi (2015), “Epistemology of Greek Harmonics”, Advances in Historical Studies 4, pp. 155-171.
▪ Dominique Proust (2009), “The Harmony of the Spheres from Pythagoras to Voyager”, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 5(S260), pp. 358-367.
▪ Margaret Murata, “Music History in the Musurgia universalis of Athanasius Kircher”, John W. O'Malley (ed.), The Jesuits: Cultures, Sciences, and the Arts, 1540-1773 (University of Toronto Press, 1999), 190-207.
▪ Penelope Gouk (1999), Music, Science, and Natural Magic in Seventeenth-Century England (New Haven: Yale University Press)
▪ 원준식, “근대 과학혁명과 음악의 합리화”, 『미학 예술학 연구』 37 (2013), pp.125-157.
▪ 원준식, “근대 과학혁명과 천구의 음악”, 『미학 예술학 연구』 41 (2014), pp.185-212.
▪ 원준식, “뉴턴의 통합적 자연관과 음악적 유비”, 『미학 예술학 연구』 45 (2015), pp. 3-32.
▪ 서인정, “피타고라스의 우주의 음악론”, 『미학 예술학 연구』 18 (2003), pp.167-186.
□ 프톨레마이오스의 Harmonics
▪ Robert D Novak (1999), Ptolemy Harmonics: Translation and Commentary (Brill)
▪ Andrew Barker (2015), Porphyry's Commentary on Ptolemy's Harmonics: A Greek Text and Annotated Translation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
▪ Andrew Barker (2010), “Mathematical Beauty Made Audible: Musical Aesthetics in Ptolemy’s Harmonics”, Classical Philology 105(4), pp. 403-420.
□ 케플러의 우주
▪ Patrick J. Boner (2013), Kepler's Cosmological Synthesis: Astrology, Mechanism, and the Soul (Leiden: Brill NV.,)
□ 로버트 플러드의 우주의 하모니
▪ William H. Huffman (1988), Robert Fludd and the End of the Renaissance (London; New York: Routledge)
▪ Peter Hauge (2008), “Robert Fludd (1574-1637): A Musical Charlatan? A Contextual Study of His “Temple of Music (1617-18)””, International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music 39(1), pp. 3-29.
□ 근대 초 음향학
▪ Paolo Mancosu, “Acoustics and optics”, Katharine Park, Lorraine Daston (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science. Volume 3: Early Modern Science (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 596-610.
3주. 천문학과 우주론
■ 독서 및 발제 자료
▪ Robert Westman (1994), “Two Cultures or On? A Second Look at Kuhn's The Copernical Revolution,” Isis 85, 79-115.
▪ Kathleen M. Crowther and Peter Barker (2013), “Training the Intelligent Eye: Understanding Illustrations in Early Modern Astronomy Texts”, Isis 104(3), pp. 429-470.
▪ H. Darrel Rutkin (2006), “Astrology”, Katharine Park, Lorraine Daston (eds)., The Cambridge History of Science. Volume 3: Early Modern Science (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 541-561.
▪ 코페르니쿠스, 『천구의 회전에 관하여』, 홍성욱 편역, 『과학고전선집』 (서울대학교출판부, 2006), pp. 1-46.
▪ André Goddu (2010), Copernicus and the Aristotelian Tradition: Education, Reading, and Philosophy in Copernicus's Path to Heliocentrism (Leiden: Brill), pp. 325-386.
▪ Ernan McMullin (2011), “Kepler: Moving the Earth”, The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1(1), pp. 3–22.
▪ 데카르트, 『세계』, 홍성욱 편역, 『과학고전선집』, (서울대학교출판부, 2006), pp. 201-260.
▪ 뉴턴, 『자연철학의 수학적 원리』, 홍성욱 편역, 『과학고전선집』, (서울대학교출판부, 2006), pp. 329? 409-415.
■ 참고 자료
□ 고대 과학 및 수학에 관한 원전 일부
▪ M.R. Cohen and I.E. Drabkin (eds.)(1948), A Source Book in Greek Science (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press)
▪ Georgia L. Irby-Massie (2002), Greek Science of the Hellenistic Era: A Sourcebook (London: Routledge)
▪ J. L. Ackrill (ed.)(1987), A New Aristotle Reader (Princeton)
□ 고대 천문학
▪ Wilbur R. Knorr (1990), “Plato and Eudoxus on the Planetary Motions,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 21, pp. 313-329.
▪ Ido Yavetz (1998), “On the homocentric spheres of Eudoxus,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 52, pp. 221-278.
▪ Hugh Thurston (2002), “Greek Mathematical Astronomy Reconsidered,” Isis 93(1), pp. 58-69.
□ 프톨레마이오스의 천문학
▪ Owen Gingerich (2002), “The Trouble with Ptolemy,” Isis 93(1), pp. 70-74.
▪ Donn MacMinn (1998), “An Analysis of Ptolemy's Treatment of Retrograde Motion,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 29, pp. 257-270.
▪ Bernard R. Goldstein (1997), “Saving the Phenomena: The Background to Ptolemy's Planetary Theory,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 28, pp. 1-12.
□ 이슬람의 천문학
▪ David A. King (1993), Astronomy in the Service of Islam (Aldershot: Variorum).
□ 르네상스기의 천문학 연구
▪ Ann Moyer, “The Astronomers' Game: Astrology and University Culture in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries”, Early Science and Medicine 4(3) (1999), pp. 228-250.
□ 천문학 혁명
▪ Thomas S. Kuhn (1957), The Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press). 【 번역본 『코페르니쿠스 혁명』 】
▪ Edward Rosen (1984), Copernicus and the Scientific Revolution (Florida: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company).
▪ Robert S. Westman, “The Copernicans and the Churches,” in David C. Lindberg and Ronald L. Numbers (eds.), God and Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986), pp. 76-113. 【 번역본 『신과 자연』
□ 티코 브라헤
▪ J.R. Christianson (2000), On Tycho's Island: Tycho Brahe and His Assistants, 1570-1601 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
▪ J.R. Christianson (1998), “Tycho Brahe in Scandinavian Scholarship,” History of Science 36, pp. 467-484.
▪ O. Hannaway (1986), “Laboratory Design and the Aim of Science: Andreas Libavius versus Tycho Brahe,” Isis 77, 585-610.
▪ Joel Shackelford (1993), “Tycho Brahe, Laboratory Design, and the Aim of Science: Reading Plans in Context,” Isis 84, 211-230.
□ 케플러
▪ Johannes Kepler, Kepler’s Somnium: The Dream, or Posthumous Work on Lunar Astronomy. Translation (from the 1634 edition) and commentary by Edward Rosen. (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1967)
▪ J.V. Field (1988), Kepler's Geometrical Cosmology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
▪ Patrick J. Boner (2013), Kepler's Cosmological Synthesis: Astrology, Mechanism and the Soul (Leiden; Boston: Brill)
▪ Job S. J. Kozhamthadam (1994), The Discovery of Kepler's Laws: The Interaction of Science, Philosophy, and Religion (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press).
4주. 수학
■ 독서 및 발제 자료
▪ Glen Van Brummelen (2013), Heavenly Mathematics: The Forgotten Art of Spherical Trigonometry (Princeton: Princeton University Press), pp. 1-109.
▪ W. R. Laird (1991), “Archimedes among the Humanists”, Isis 82(4), pp. 628-638.
▪ John Dee, “The Mathematical Preface to Elements of Geometry of Euclid of Megara”
▪ Jennifer M Rampling (2011), “The Elizabethan mathematics of everything: John Dee’s ‘Mathematical preface’ to Euclid’s Elements”, BSHM Bulletin, 26(3), pp. 135-146.
▪ Peter Dear (1995), Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press), pp.151-179.
▪ 데카르트, 홍성욱 편역, 『과학고전선집』, (서울대학교출판부, 2006), pp. 289-310.
▪ Niccolò Guicciardini (2009), Isaac Newton on Mathematical Certainty and Method (Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press), pp. 331-337.
■ 참고 자료
□ 고대 그리스
▪ Constance Chu Meinwald (2002), “Plato's Pythagoreanism,” Ancient Philosophy 22, 87-101.
▪ David Fowler, (1999) The mathematics of Plato's Academy: A new reconstruction. Second edition (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
▪ Leonid Zhmud (1989), “Pythagoras as a Mathematician,” Historia Mathematica 16(2), pp. 249-288.
▪ Jean Christianidis (2004), Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands: Springer)
□ 유클리드
▪ Orna Harari (2003), “The Concept of Existence and the Role of Constructions in Euclid's Elements,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 57, pp. 1-23.
▪ Ivor Grattan-Guinness (1996), “Numbers, Magnitudes, Ratios, and Proportions in Euclid's Elements; How Did He Handle Them?”, Historia Mathematica 24(4), pp. 355-375.
□ 이슬람 수학
▪ Alpay Ôzdural (2000), “Mathematics and Arts: Connections between Theory and Practice in the Medieval Islamic World,” Historia Mathematica 27(2), pp. 171-201.
▪ J. Lennart Berggren (1997), “Mathematics and Her Sisters in Medieval Islam; A Selective Review of Work Done from 1985 to 1995,” Historia Mathematica, 24(4): 407-440.
□ 삼각법
▪ Glen Van Brummelen (2009), The Mathematics of the Heavens and the Earth: The Early History of Trigonometry (Princeton, N.J.; Oxford: Princeton University Press).
▪ E. Maor (1998), Trigonometric Delights (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press) 【번역본 『사인 코사인의 즐거움』】
□ 르네상스 수학
▪ Antoni Malet (2006), “Renaissance Notions of Number and Magnitude”, Historia Mathematica 33(1), pp. 63-81.
▪ Kirsti Andersen and Henk J. M. Bos, “Pure mathematics”, Katharine Park, Lorraine Daston (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science. Volume 3: Early Modern Science (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 696-724.
▪ Jim Bennett (1998), “Practical Geometry and Operative Knowledge,” Configuration 6, pp. 195-222.
▪ Richard W. Hadden (1994), On the Shoulders of Merchants: Exchange and the Mathematical Conception of Nature in Early Modern Europe (Albany, State University of New York Press), pp. 83-114.
□ 과학혁명기의 수학
▪ M. Mazzotti (1998), “The Geometers of God: Mathematics and Reaction in the Kingdom of Naple”, Isis 89(4), pp. 674-701.
▪ M. Biagiloli (1989), “The Social Status of Italian Mathematicians”, History of Science 27, pp. 41-95.
▪ P. Mancosu (1992), “Descartes's Géométrie and revolutions in Mathematics”, in D. Gillies (ed.), Revolutions in Mathematics (Oxford: Claredon Press), pp. 83–116.
▪ Chikara Sasaki (2003), Descartes's Mathematical Thought (Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer)
□ 뉴턴과 라이프니츠의 미적분학
▪ H. G. Alexander, (ed.)(1956), The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence: with Extracts from Newton’s Principia and Opticks (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
▪ Richard S. Westfall, Philosophers at War: The Quarrel between Newton and Leibniz (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980, 2002)
5주. 자연철학
■ 독서 및 발제 자료
▪ Edward Grant (2007), A History of Natural Philosophy: From the Ancient World to the Nineteenth Century (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 1-316.
▪ Alan Gabbey, “What Was “Mechanical” about “The Mechanical Philosophy?”, Carla Rita Palmerino and J. M. M. H. Thijssen, (eds.), The Reception of the Galilean Science of Motion in Seventeenth-Century Europe (Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004), pp. 11-23.
▪ Ann Blair (2006), “Natural Philosophy”, Katharine Park, Lorraine Daston (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science. Volume 3: Early Modern Science (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 365-406.
■ 참고 자료
□ 플라톤 이전의 그리스 자연철학자들
▪ G. S. Kirk and J. E. Raven (1957), The Pre-Socratic Philosophers (Cambridge).
▪ P. Nicolacopoulos (ed.)(1990), Greek Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic).
▪ Jonathan Barnes (1987), Early Greek Philosophy (London: Penguin Books).
▪ A. A. Long (1999), The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press).
▪ Patricia Curd, (ed.)(1995), A Presocratics Reader: Selected Fragments and Testimonia, tr. Richard D. McKirahan, Jr. (Indianapolis: Hackett Press).
▪ Karl R. Popper, The world of Parmenides: Essays on the presocratic Enlightenment. Edited by Arne F. Petersen, with the assistance of Jørgen Mejer (London: Routledge, 1998)
□ 플라톤
▪ Anne Freire Ashbaugh (1988), Plato's Theory of Explanation: A Study of the Cosmological Account in the Timaeus (Albany, N.Y.: S.U.N.Y. Press)
□ 아리스토텔레스
▪ J. L. Ackrill (ed.)(1987), A New Aristotle Reader (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
▪ G. E. R. Lloyd (1996), Aristotelian Explorations (Cambridge: New York: Cambridge University Press).
▪ Jonathan Barnes (ed.)(1995), The Cambridge companion to Aristotle (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press).
▪ Constance Blackwell and Sachiko Kusukawa, (ed.)(1999), Philosophy in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries: Conversations with Aristotle (Adershot: Ashgate).
▪ Cees Leijenhorst, Christoph Lüthy, Johannes M.M.H. Thijssen (eds.)(2002), The dynamics of Aristotelian natural philosophy from antiquity to the seventeenth century (Leiden: Brill).
□ 중세 자연철학
▪ Edward Grant (2000), “God and Natural Philosophy: The Late Middle Ages and Sir Isaac Newton”, Early Science and Medicine, 5(3), pp. 279-298.
▪ Edward Grant (2010), The Nature of Natural Philosophy in the Late Middle Ages (Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press).
▪ Stephen Gaukroger (2006), The Emergence of a Scientific Culture: Science and the Shaping of Modernity 1210-1685 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
□ 르네상스기의 자연철학
▪ Charles B. Schmitt et al. (eds.)(1988), The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
▪ J. V. Field and Frank James (eds.)(1993), Renaissance and Revolution: Humanists, Scholars, Craftsmen and Natural Philosophers in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge: New York: Cambridge University Press).
□ 기계적 철학
▪ Marie Boas (1952), “The Establishment of the Mechanical Philosophy,” Osiris 10, pp. 412-541.
▪ Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers (eds.)(1998), The Cambridge History of 17th-century Philosophy vol. 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press).
▪ Daniel Garber and Sophie Roux (eds.)(2013), The Mechanization of Natural Philosophy (New York: Springer)
▪ Stephen Gaukroger (2002), Descartes’ System of Natural Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
▪ J. A. Schuster (1995), “Descartes Agonistes: New Tales of Cartesian Natural Philosophy,” Perspectives on Science 3, pp. 99-145.
6주. 역학과 광학
■ 독서 및 발제 자료
▪ 갈릴레오, 『대화』, 『새로운 두 과학』, 홍성욱 편, 『과학고전선집』, (서울대학교출판부, 2006), pp. 47-168.
▪ Domenico Beroloni Meli (2006), “Mechanics”, Katharine Park, Lorraine Daston (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science. Volume 3: Early Modern Science (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 632-672.
▪ William R. Shea (2004), “The “Rational” Descartes and the “Empirical” Galileo”, Carla Rita Palmerino and J. M. M. H. Thijssen, (eds.), The Reception of the Galilean Science of Motion in Seventeenth-Century Europe (Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 67-82.
▪ 데카르트, 『광학』, 홍성욱 편, 『과학고전선집』, (서울대학교출판부, 2006), pp. 261-288.
▪ 뉴턴, 『광학』, 홍성욱 편, 『과학고전선집』, (서울대학교출판부, 2006), pp. 417-443.
▪ Olivier Darrigol (2012), A History of Optics: from Greek Antiquity to the Nineteenth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 1-48.
■ 참고 자료
□ 갈릴레오의 역학
▪ Ron Naylor (2003), “Galileo, Copernicanism and the Origins of the New Science of Motion”, The British Journal for the History of Science 36(2), pp. 151-181.
▪ Alexander J. Hahn (2002), “The Pendulum Swings Again: A Mathematical Reassessment of Galileo's Experiments with Inclined Planes,” Archive for the History of Exacts Sciences 56, pp. 339-361.
▪ Maurice A. Finocchiaro (2003), “Physical-Mathematical Reasoning: Galileo on the Extruding Power of Terrestrial Rotation,” Synthese 134, pp. 217-244.
▪ 12주. 과학실험 중 ‘갈릴레오 실험’ 참고문헌 참조
□ 데카르트의 역학
▪ Stephen Gaukroger, “Descartes’ Project for a Mathematical Physics,” Stephen Gaukroger (ed.), Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics, and Physics (Sussex: Harvester Press, 1980), pp. 97-140.
▪ Martial Gueroult, “The Metaphysics and Physics of Force in Descartes,”, Stephen Gaukroger (ed.), Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics, and Physics (Sussex: Harvester Press, 1980), pp. 196-229.
▪ Alan Gabbey, “Force and Inertia in the Seventeenth Century: Descartes and Newton,” Stephen Gaukroger (ed.), Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics, and Physics (Sussex: Harvester Press, 1980), pp. 230-320.
▪ Daniel Garber (1992), Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)
□ 호이겐스의 역학
▪ Marta Spranzi Zuber (1999), “Huygens’ Rejection of Absolute Motion: Some Aspects of the Dilemma,” Physis 36, 55-71.
□ 광학의 역사 일반
▪ Olivier Darrigol (2012), A History of Optics from Greek Antiquity to the Nineteenth Century (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press)
□ 프톨레마이오스의 광학
▪ A. Mark Smith (1988), “The Psychology of Visual Perception in Ptolemy's “Optics”,” Isis 79, pp. 189-207.
▪ A. Mark Smith (1999), Ptolemy and the Foundations of Ancient Mathematical Optics (Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society)
□ 케플러의 광학
▪ Raz Chen-Morris (2016), Measuring Shadows: Kepler’s Optics of Invisibility (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press)
▪ Kepler, Optics: Paralipomena to Witelo and the Optical Part of Astronomy, Translated by William H. Donahue (Santa Fe: Green Lion Press, 2000)
□ 데카르트의 광학
▪ Margaret J. Osler, ”Descartes's Optics: Light, the Eye, and Visual Perception”, Janet Broughton and John Carriero (eds.), A Companion to Descartes (Blackwell Publishing, 2008), pp. 124-145.
▪ Alan E. Shapiro (1974), “Light, Pressure, and Rectilinear Propagation: Descartes’ Celestial Optics and Newton’s Hydrostatics,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 5, pp. 239-296.
□ 뉴턴의 광학
▪ Dannis L. Sepper (1994), Newton's Optical Writings: A Guided Study (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press)
7주. 자연사 연구와 수집
■ 독서 및 발제 자료
▪ James G. Lennox (2001), Aristotle's Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), pp. 261-292.
▪ Sachiko Kusukawa (2012), Picturing the Book of Nature: Image, Text, and Argument in Sixteenth-Century Human Anatomy and Medical Botany (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 98-177.
▪ Brian W. Ogilvie (2006), The Science of Describing: Natural History in Renaissance Europe (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 209-271.
▪ Alan W Bates (2005), “Good, Common, Regular, and Orderly: Early Modern Classifications of Monstrous Births”, Social History of Medicine 18(2), pp. 141-158.
▪ Paula Findlen (2006), “Anatomy theaters, botanical gardens, and natural history collections”, Katharine Park, Lorraine Daston (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science. Volume 3: Early Modern Science (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 272-289.
▪ Peter Anstey (2012), “Francis Bacon and the Classification of Natural History”, Early Science and Medicine 17(1-2), pp. 11-31.
■ 참고 자료
□ 아리스토텔레스의 동물 연구
▪ Allan Gotthelf, Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle's
Biology (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011)
□ 베이컨의 자연관
▪ Richard Serjeantson (2014), “Francis Bacon and the “Interpretation of Nature” in the Late Renaissance,” Isis 105(4), pp. 681-705.
□ 호기심의 방
▪ 노자연 (2011), “17세기 영국의 ‘호기심의 방”, 「영국 연구」 25, pp. 75-110.
▪ Adriana Turpin (2007), “The New World Collections of Duke Cosimo Ⅰ de' Medici and their Role in the Creation of a Kunst- and Wunderkammer in the Palazzo Vecchio”, R.J.W. Evans and Alexander Marr, Curiosity and Wonder from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment (Aldershot, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate), pp. 63-86.
□ 경이로운 것 혹은 괴물
▪ Lorraine Daston and Katharine Park (1998), Wonders and The Order of Nature, 1150-1750 (New York: Zone Book), pp. 21-66.
▪ Sandra Cheng (2012), “The Cult of the Monstrous: Caricature, Physiognomy, and Monsters in Early Modern Italy”, Preternature: Critical and Historical Studies on the Preternatural, 1(2), pp.197-231.
▪ Zakiya Hanafi (2000), The Monster in the Machine: Magic, Medicine, and the Marvelous in the Time of the Scientific Revolution (Durham: Duke University Press)
□ 물고기 연구
▪ Kusukawa, Sachiko (2000), “The ‘Historia Piscium’ (1686),” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 54(2), pp. 179-197.
8주. 의학과 질병
■ 독서 및 발제 자료
▪ Harold J. Cook (2011), “The History of Medicine and the Scientific Revolution”, Isis 102(10), pp. 102-108.
▪ Nancy G. Siraisi (2012), “Medicine, 1450–1620, and the History of Science”, Isis 103(3), pp. 491-514.
▪ Sachiko Kusukawa (2012), Picturing the Book of Nature: Image, Text, and Argument in Sixteenth-Century Human Anatomy and Medical Botany (University of Chicago Press), pp. 98-248.
▪ Evan R. Ragland (2017), ““Making Trials” in Sixteenth- and Early Seventeenth-Century European Academic Medicine”, Isis 108(3), pp. 503-528.
▪ Rafael Mandressi (2016), “Affected Doctors: Dead Bodies and Affective and Professional Cultures in Early Modern European Anatomy”, Osiris 31(1), pp. 119–136.
▪ Rina Knoeff (2015), “Touching Anatomy: On the Handling of Preparations in the Anatomical Cabinets of Frederik Ruysch (1638–1731)”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biol & Biomed Sci 49, pp. 32-44.
▪ 하비, 『동물의 심장과 피의 운동에 대한 해부학적 논고』, 홍성욱 편, 『과학고전선집』, (서울대학교출판부, 2006), pp. 311-328.
■ 참고 자료
□ 의학 일반
▪ Julie Anderson, Emm Barnes, and Emma Shackleton (2011), The Art of Medicine: Over 2,000 Years of Images and Imagination (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; Lewes, UK: Ilex Press)
□ 갈렌
▪ Susan P. Mattern (2013), The Prince of Medicine: Galen in the Roman Empire (New York: Oxford University Press)
□ 중세 의학
▪ Cornelius O'Boyle (1998), The Art of Medicine: Medical Teaching at the University of Paris, 1250-1400 (Leiden; Boston: Brill)
□ 르네상스 의학
▪ Elizabeth W. Mellyn (2013), “Passing on Secrets: Interactions between Latin and Vernacular Medicine in Medieval Europe”, I Tatti Studies in the Italian Renaissance 16(1/2), pp. 289-309.
□ 베살리우스
▪ 11주. 과학과 예술 참조
▪ Andreas Vesalius, On the Fabric of the Human Body, 3 vols. (San Francisco:
Norman, 1998-2002)
▪ Nancy G. Siraisi (1997), “Vesalius and the Reading of Galen's Teleology,” Renaissance Quarterly 50, pp. 1-37.
▪ Martin Kemp (1996), “Temples of the Body and Temples of the Cosmos: Vision and Visualization in the Vesalian and Copernican Revolutions,” Brian S. Baigrie (ed.), Picturing Knowledge: Historical and Philosophical Problems Concerning the Use of Art in Science (Toronto: University of Toronto Press), pp. 40-85.
□ 하비
▪ Emerson T. McMullen (1998), William Harvey and the Use of Purpose in the Scientific Revolution: Cosmos by Chance or Universe by Design? (Lanham: University Press of America)
▪ Andrew Wear (1983), “William Harvey and the ‘Way of the Anatomists’,” History of Science 21, pp. 223-249.
▪ Thomas Fuchs (2001), The Mechanization of the Heart: Harvey and Descartes (Rochester, N. Y.: University of Rochester Press)
▪ Andrew Gregory (2001), Harvey's Heart: The Discovery of Blood Circulation (Cambridge: Icon Books)
□ 해부
▪ Jonathan Sawday (1994), The Body Eemblazoned: Dissection and the Human Body in Renaissance Culture (London; New York : Routledge)
▪ Roger French (1999), Dissection and Vivisection in the European Renaissance (Aldershot; Brookfield, Vt.: Ashgate)
▪ Andrea Carlino (1999), Books of the Body: Anatomical Ritual and Renaissance Learning (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)
▪ Anita Guerrini (2003), Experimenting with Humans and Animals: From Galen to Animal Rights (Baltimore, Md.: The Johns Hopkins University Press)
▪ Cynthia Klestinec (2011), Theaters of Anatomy: Students, Teachers, and Traditions of Dissection in Renaissance Venice (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press)
□ 전염병
▪ Suzanne E. Hatty, James Hatty (1999), The Disordered Body. Epidemic Disease and Cultural Transformation (Albany, N.Y. : State University of New York Press)
▪ Faye Marie Getz (1991), “Black Death and the Silver Lining: Meaning, Continuity, and Revolutionary Change in Histories of Medieval Plague,” Journal of the History of Biology 24, pp. 265-289.
9주. 지리학과 지도학
■ 독서 및 발제 자료
▪ Florian Mittenhuber (2010), “The Tradition of Texts and Maps in Ptolemy’s Geography”, Alexander Jones (ed.), Ptolemy in Perspective: Use and Criticism of his Work from Antiquity to the Nineteenth Century (Dordrecht; London: Springer), pp. 95-119.
▪ 정은진, “마파 문디(Mappae Mundi): 지도에 그려진 유토피아”, 「서양미술사학회 논문집」 41 (2014), pp. 233-257.
▪ Francesca Fiorani (2005), The Marvel of Maps: Art, Cartography and Politics in Renaissance Italy (New Haven: Yale University Press), pp. 1-26.
▪ Sean E. Roberts (2013), Printing a Mediterranean World: Florence, Constantinople, and the Renaissance of Geography (Cambridge: Harvard University Press), pp. 15-88.
▪ Mark Monmonier (2004), Rhumb Lines and Map Wars: A Social History of the Mercator Projection (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 1-120. 【번역본 『지도전쟁』
■ 참고 자료
□ 고대 지리학과 지도학
▪ Alastair Strang (1998), “The Analysis of Ptolemy's Geography”, The Cartographic Journal 35(1), pp. 27-47.
▪ Alexander Jones (2012), “Ptolemy’s Geography: Mapmaking and the Scientific Enterprise”, Richard J. A. Talbert (ed.), Ancient Perspectives: Maps and their Place in Mesopotamia, Egypt, Greece, and Rome (Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press), pp. 109-128.
▪ J. L. Berggren (1991), “Ptolemy's Maps of Earth and the Heavens: A New Interpretation,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 43, pp. 133-144.
□ 중세 지도
▪ Alessandro Scafi (2006), Mapping Paradise: A History of Heaven on Earth (Chicago: University of Chicago)
▪ John F. Moffitt (1993), “Medieval Mappaemundi and Ptolemy's Chorographia”, Gesta 32(1), pp. 59–68.
▪ Evelyn Edson (2007), The World Map, 1300-1492: The Persistence of Tradition and Transformation (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press)
▪ Roel Nicolai (2015), “The Premedieval Origin of Portolan Charts: New Geodetic Evidence”, Isis 106(3), pp. 517-543.
□ 르네상스 지도와 항해술
▪ W. G. L. Randles (2000), Geography, Cartography and Nautical Science in the Renaissance: The Impact of the Great Discoveries (Aldershot; Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate/Variorum)
▪ 정원 (2013), “생존을 위한 과학이자 국가를 위한 과학이었던 항해술: 수학자 시몬 스테빈을 통해 본 1600년경 네덜란드의 항해술”, 「서양사 연구」 49, pp. 41-82.
□ 지도 속 바다 괴물
▪ Chet Van Duzer (2013), Sea Monsters on Medieval and Renaissance Maps (British Library)
10주. 번역과 인쇄
■ 독서 및 발제 자료
▪ Dimitri Gutas (1998), Greek Thought, Arabic Culture: the Graeco-Arabic Translation Movement in Baghdad and Early Abbasid Society (2nd-4th/8th-10th centuries) (London: Routledge), pp. 61-74; 107-120; 151-186.
번역본(『그리스 사상과 아랍문명』)
▪ Michèle Goyens, Pieter de Leemans, An Smets (eds.)(2008), Science Translated: Latin and Vernacular Translations of Scientific Treatises in Medieval Europe (Leuven: Leuven University Press), pp. 1-10.
▪ George Saliba (2007), Islamic Science and the Making of the European Renaissance (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press), pp. 73-130; 233-255.
▪ Elizabeth L. Eisenstein (1983/2005), The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 123-163; 209-285. 【 『근대 유럽의 인쇄 미디어 혁명』)
■ 참고 자료
□ 이슬람 과학
▪ A.I. Sabra (1987), “The Appropriation and Subsequent Naturalization of Greek Science in Medieval Islam: A Preliminary Statement,” History of Science 25, pp. 223-243.
▪ Howard R. Turner (1997), Science in Medieval Islam: An Illustrated Introduction (Austin: University Of Texas Press)
□ 번역
▪ Michèle Goyens, Pieter De Leemans, and An Smets (eds.)(2008), Science Translated: Latin and Vernacular Translations of Scientific Treatises in Medieval Europe (Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press)
▪ Peter Burke and Ronnie Po-Chia Hsia, (eds.)(2007), Cultural Translation in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
□ 과학 삽화
▪ 야마모토 요시타가 저, 남윤호 역, 『16세기 문화혁명』, (동아시아, 2010)
▪ 11주. 과학과 예술 참조
11주. 과학과 예술
■ 독서 및 발제 자료
▪ Sven Dupré (2010), “Art History, History of Science, and Visual Experience”, Isis 101(3), pp. 618-622.
▪ Pamela H. Smith (2006), “Art, Science, and Visual Culture in Early Modern Europe”, Isis 97(1), pp. 83-100.
▪ Carmen Nickrasz and Claudia Swan, “Art”, Katharine Park, Lorraine Daston (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science. Volume 3: Early Modern Science (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 773-800.
▪ Mark A. Peterson (2011), Galileo's Muse: Renaissance Mathematics and the Arts (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), pp. 99-148; 203-291.
■ 참고 자료
□ 르네상스기의 과학과 예술
▪ Mary Quinlan-McGrath (2013), Influences: Art, Optics, and Astrology in the Italian Renaissance (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press)
▪ .Domenico Laurenza (2012), “Art and Anatomy in Renaissance Italy: IMAGES FROM A SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION”, The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin 69(3), pp. 4-48.
▪ 조은정 (2014), “유클리드 광학과 초기 선 원근법 이론의 형성”, 「미술이론과 현장」 18, pp. 7-31.
▪ Martin Kemp (2006), Seen|Unseen (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press) 【서울대 도서관 비치: 번역본(『보이는 것과 보이지 않는 것』)
▪ 조은정 (2010), “알베르티의 건축 설계론과 비트루비우스”, 「미술이론과 현장」 9, pp. 195-215.
▪ 정은진 (2012). 「해부학이 미술을 만날 때: 안드레아 베살리우스의 “인체의 구조에 대하여”」, 「미술사학보」 38, pp. 184-211.
▪ Martin Kemp, “Temples of the Body and Temples of the Cosmos: Vision and Visualization in the Vesalian and Copernican Revolutions,” in Brian S. Baigrie (ed.), Picturing Knowledge: Historical and Philosophical Problems Concerning the Use of Art in Science (Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press, 1996), pp. 40-85.
▪ Alina A. Payne (1999), The Architectural Treatise in the Italian Renaissance Architectural Invention. Ornament. and Literary Culture (Cambridge University Press)
12주. 과학 실험
■ 독서 및 발제 자료
▪ Bruce T. Moran (2011), “Focus: Alchemy and the History of Science”, Isis 102(20), pp. 300-304.
▪ James MacLachlan (1998), “Experimenting in the History of Science”, Isis 89(1) , pp. 90-92.
▪ Maarten Van Dyck (2005), “The Paradox of Conceptual Novelty and Galileo’s Use of Experiments”, Philosophy of Science 72(5), pp. 864-875.
▪ Carolyn Merchant (2008), ““The Violence of Impediments”: Francis Bacon and the Origins of Experimentation”, Isis 99(4), pp. 731-760.
▪ Steven Shapin Simon Schaffer (1985), Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life (Princeton: Princeton University Press), pp. 2-154.
■ 참고 자료
□ 베이컨 실험 철학
▪ Carolyn Merchant (2008), ““The Violence of Impediments”: Francis Bacon and the Origins of Experimentation”, Isis 99(4), pp. 731-760.
□ 연금술
▪ Sami K. Hamarneh (1982), “Arabic-Islamic Alchemy: Three Intertwined Stages,” Ambix 29, pp. 74-87.
▪ Michela Pereira (1999), “Alchemy and the Use of Vernacular Languages in the Late Middle Ages,” Speculum 74, pp. 336-356.
▪ Pamela H. Smith (1994), The Business of Alchemy: Science and Culture in the Holy Roman Empire (Princeton: Princeton University Press)
▪ Philip Ball (2003), Bright Earth: Art and the Invention of Color (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 115-160(번역본). 【 번역본 『브라이트 어스』
▪ Bruce T. Moran (2005), Distilling Knowledge: Alchemy, Chemistry, and the Scientific Revolution (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press)
▪ Owen Hannaway (1986), “Laboratory Design and the Aim of Science: Andreas Libavius versus Tycho Brahe”, Isis 77(4), pp. 584-610. 【번역본 『프리즘: 역사로 과학 읽기』
□ 갈릴레오 실험
▪ Peter Dear (1990), “Miracles, Experiment and the Ordinary course of Nature”, Isis 81, pp. 663-683.
▪ S. Drake, “Galileo's New Science of Motion”, eds. by M. L. Righini Boneli and William R. Shea, Reason, Experiment and Mysticism (New York: Science History Publication, 1975), pp. 131-156.
▪ David K. Hill (1990), “Galileo’s Analysis and Synthesis”, Isis 81, pp. 283-291.
▪ Ronald H. Naylor, “Galileo's experimental discourse”, David Gooding, Trevor Pinch, Simon Schaffer (eds.), The Uses of Experiment-studies in the natural science, (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Pr. ,1989), pp. 117-134.
▪ Ronald H. Naylor (1990), “Galileo's Method of Analysis and Synthesis”, Isis 81, pp. 695-707.
▪ Winifred Lovell Wisan (1984), “Galileo and the Process of Scientific Creation”, Isis 75, pp. 269-286.
▪ Michael Segre (1980), “The Role of Experiment in Galileo's Physics”, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 23, pp. 227-252.
▪ Pierre Costabel, “Mathematics and Galileo's inclined Plane Experiment”, eds. by M. L. Righini Boneli and William R. Shea eds., Reason, Experiment and Mysticism (New York: Science History Publication, 1975), pp. 157-176.
▪ S. Drake (1990), Nature, Experiment, and the Sciences: essays on Galileo and the history of science (Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers)
▪ Gary Hatfield, “Metaphysics and the new science”, eds. by David C. Lindberg and Robert S. Westman, Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Pr.,1990), pp. 93-166.
13주. 과학 기구와 기계
■ 독서 및 발제 자료
▪ 갈릴레오 갈릴레이 저, 앨버트 반 헬덴 역해, 장헌영 역, 『시데레우스 눈치우스: 갈릴레이의 천문노트』, (승산, 2004)
▪ Mario Biagioli (2006), Galileo’s Instruments of Credit: Telescopes, Images, Secrecy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 1-19; 77-135.
▪ Ken Arnold and Thomas Söderqvist (2011), “Medical Instruments in Museums: Immediate Impressions and Historical Meanings”, Isis 102(4), pp.718-729.
▪ Jim Bennett (2011), “Early Modern Mathematical Instruments”, Isis 102(4), pp. 697-705.
▪ Alexander Marr (2007), “Gentille Curiosite: Wonder-Working and the Culture of Automata in the Late Renaissance”, R.J.W. Evans and Alexander Marr, Curiosity and Wonder from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment (Aldershot, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate), pp. 149-170.
▪ Jessica, Riskin (2010), “Machines in the Garden.” Republics of Letters: A Journal for the Study of Knowledge, Politics, and the Arts 1(2), pp. 16-43.
■ 참고 자료
□ Instrument 일반
▪ Liba Taub (2011), “Focus: The History of Scientific Instruments Introduction: Reengaging with Instruments”, Isis 102(4), pp. 689-696.
▪ Jim Bennett, “Early Modern Mathematical Instruments”, Isis 102(4) (2011), pp.
697-705.
▪ Simon Schaffer (2011), “Easily Cracked: Scientific Instruments in States of Disrepair”, Isis 102(4), pp. 706-717.
□ 군사 기술
▪ Kelly DeVries, “Sites of military science and technology”, Katharine Park, Lorraine Daston (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science. Volume 3: Early Modern Science (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 306-319.
□ 망원경과 현미경
▪ Daniel Špelda (2017), “The Role of the Telescope and Microscope in the Constitution of the Idea of Scientific Progress”, The Seventeenth Century 76, pp. 1-20.
▪ Yaakov Zik (2001), “Science and Instruments: The Telescope as a Scientific Instrument at the Beginning of the Seventeenth Century”, Perspectives on Science 9(3), pp. 259-284.
□ 오토마타
▪ Raffaele Pisano (2015), “Historical and Epistemological Reflections on the Culture of Machines around the Renaissance: Machines, Machineries and Perpetual Motion.” Acta Baltica 3(1), pp. 69–87.
□ 갈릴레오
▪ Mario Biagioli (1990), “Galileo the Emblem Maker”, Isis 81(2), pp. 230-258.
▪ Mario Biagioli (1993), Galileo, Courtier: The Practice of Science in the Culture of Absolutism (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press)
▪ Franco Giudice (2014), “Galileo’s Cosmological View from the Sidereus Nuncius to Letters on Sunspots.” Galilæana 11, pp. 49–63.
▪ John L. Heilbron (2010), Galileo and All the Stars: A New Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
▪ Mary G. Winkler and Albert van Helden (1992), “Representing the Heavens: Galileo and Visual Astronomy,” Isis 83, pp.195-217.
14주. 과학과 종교
■ 독서 및 발제 자료
▪ Edward Grant (2006), Science and Religion, 400 B.C. to A.D. 1550: From Aristotle to Copernicus (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press), pp. 1-32; 165-248.
▪ Paula Findlen and Hannah Marcus (2012), “Science under Inquisition: Heresy and Knowledge in Catholic Reformation Rome”, Isis 103(2), pp. 376-382.
▪ David C. Lindberg, “Galileo, the Church, and the Cosmos,” “Christianity and the Mechanistic Universe,” in David C. Lindberg and Ronald L. Numbers (eds.)(2003), When Science and Christianity Meet (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 33-84.
▪ Maurice A. Finocchiaro (2005), Retrying Galileo, 1633-1992 (Berkeley and London: University of California Press), pp. 1-42.
■ 참고 자료
□ 과학과 종교 일반
▪ David C. Lindberg and Ronald L. Numbers (eds.)(1986), God and Nature Historical Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science (Berkely and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press) 【 번역본 『신과 자연』)
▪ John H. Brook (2014/1991), Science and Religion (Cambridge, Cambridge Unviersity Press)
▪ Thomas Dixon (2008), Science and Religion: A very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press) 【 번역본 『과학과 종교』
□ 머튼 테제
▪ I. Bernard Cohen (ed.)(1990), Puritanism and the Rise of Modern Science: The Merton Thesis Edited, with an introduction by with the assistance of K. E. Duffin and Stuart Strickland (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press)
▪ Rivka Feldhay and Yehuda Elkana (eds.)(1989), “‘After Merton’: Protestant and Catholic Science in 17th-century Europe,” Science in Context 3, pp. 3-302.
□ 갈릴레오 재판
▪ Maurice A. Finocchiaro ed. and tr. The Galileo Affair: A Documentary History (Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press, 1989)
▪ I. Stengers, “The Galileo Affair,” in M. Serres (ed.), History of Scientific Thought: Elements of a History of Science (Oxford: Blackwell, 1995), pp. 280-314.
(2018.06.04.)
