- 과목명: <인식론 연습: 인식론의 쟁점들>
- 서울대 철학과 대학원
- 2013년 2학기
- 담당 교수: 김기현
■ 강의 내용
이 수업은 현대 인식론의 몇 가지 쟁점들을 논의한다.
■ 과제 및 성적평가
수업을 위하여 각 참석자는 배당된 논문을 반드시 읽고 수업에 참가해야 한다. 학기 중 3회에 걸쳐 수업에서 논의되는 쟁점과 관련된 짧은 보고서(A4 4매 내외)를 제출하는 과제가 부과될 수 있다. 아울러 기말보고서를 제출해야 한다.
■ 최종학점 산출
짧은 보고서: 각 10점
이메일 질문: 10점
기말보고서: 60점
■ 필독 도서
김기현, 『현대인식론』 (민음사, 대우 학술 총서, 1998)
■ 참고 논문집
(1) Marshall Swain and George Pappas (eds.), Essays on Knowledge and Justification (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1978)
(2) Paul Moser (ed.), Empirical Knowledge (Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1986)
(3) Paul Moser and Arnold Vander Net (eds.), Human knowledge (NY: Oxford University press, 1987)
(4) Steup and Sosa (eds.)(2007), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (Massachusetts: Blackwell)
■ 강의 계획
(쟁점 1) 인식정당성의 문제
• 『현대인식론』 6장
• Sosa (1980), “The Raft and the Pyramid” in (2), (3)
• BonJour (1986), The Structure of Empirical Knowledge (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986): 2장과 5장
• Pryor (2000), “The Skeptic and the Dogmatist,” Nous 34: 517-549.
• Pryor (2007), “There is Immediate Justification,” in (4)
• Williams (2007), “Doing without Immediate Justification” in (4)
• Goldman (1979), “What is Justified Belief?”
• Feldman and Conee (1985), “Evidentialism,” Philosophical Studies 48.
(쟁점 2) 회의론
• 『현대인식론』 3장, 7장
• Armstrong, D. M. (1973), Belief, Truth and Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press): 162-175.
• Nozick (1981), Philosophical Explanations, 172-185, 197-221.
• Dretske (1970), “Epistemic Operators,” The Journal of Philosophy 67: 1007-1023.
• Dretske (1971), “Conclusive Reasons”
• Dretske (2007), “The Case against Closure”
• Hawthorne (2007), “The Case for Closure” in (3)
• Davies, M., (1998), “Externalism, Architecturalism, and Epistemic Warrant”
• Wright, B.C Smith and C. Macdonald (eds.), Knowing Our Own Minds (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 321-61.
• Wright, C. “Cogency and Question-Begging: Some Reflections on McKinsey’s Paradox and Putnam’s Proof,” in Philosophical Issues. 1998. (SOFIA volume)
• Brown, J. Chapter 7 in Anti-Individualism and Knowledge. Combridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.
• Pryor. “Externalism about content and McKinsey-style reasoning.” (PDF)
(쟁점 3) 맥락주의, Sensitivity
• DeRose (1995), “Solving the Skeptical Problem”
• DeRose (2010), “Insensitivity is Back, Baby,” Philosophical Perspectives 24: 161-187.
• Cohen (1998), “Contextualist Solutions to Epistemological Problems: Scepticism, Gettier, and the Lottery”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76.
• Schiffer (1996), “Contextualist Solutions to Skepticism”, Proceedings of Aristotelian Society 96, 317-333.
• J. Hawthorne and J. Stanley (2008), “Knowledge and Action”, Journal of Philosophy, 105(10): 571-590.
• John Hawthorne, Knowledge and Lotteries, Chapter 1 and 4.
• Jason Stanley, Knowledge and Practical Interests, Chapter 5, Conclusion.
(쟁점 4) 자기지식과 외재주의
• Gertler, “Self-Knowledge”, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (SEP)
• T. Parent, “Externalism and Self-Knowledge”, in SEP.
• Boghossian, “Content and self-knowledge”, in Ludlow and Martin (eds.), Externalism and Self-Knowledge. (ES)
• Boghossian, “What the externalist can know a priori”, in Wright, Smith and McDonald (eds.), Knowing our Own Minds. (KOM)
• McLaughlin and Tye, “Externalism, Twin Earth, and self-knowledge” in KOM.
• Dretske, “Externalism and self-knowledge”; Davidson, “Knowing one’s own mind” in ES.
• Burge, “Individualism and self-knowledge” in ES.
(쟁점 5) 의견불일치
• Feldman, “Epistemological Puzzles about Disagreement”
• Elga, Adam, “Reflection and Disagreement” Nous 41 (2007): 478-502.
• Christensen, David, “Epistemology of Disagreement: the Good News”, Phil. Review (2007): 187-217.
• Kelly, Thomas, “The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement”, in Oxford Studies in Epistemology.
• Kelly, Thomas, “Peer Disagreement and Higher Order Evidence”, in Feldman and Warfield (eds.), Disagreement (2010).
(2015.07.02.)
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기